Hero Xoom 125 vs TVS Ntorq 125
The 125cc scooter segment in India is brimming with sporty and feature-loaded options, and two of the most exciting contenders battling for supremacy are the Hero Xoom 125 and the TVS Ntorq 125. Both scooters target young riders with their bold designs, peppy performance and tech-savvy features while maintaining affordable price tags. The sporty 125cc scooter space has long been ruled by the Ntorq, with none being able to challenge its dominance. Hero’s Xoom 125 is the company’s latest attempt at cracking this sporty space. Let’s dive deep into this comprehensive comparison to help you choose your perfect urban companion.
Table of Contents
Understanding the Segment Leaders
The Hero Xoom 125 is priced between ₹86,900 and ₹92,900 (ex-showroom) and comes in two variants: VX and ZX. In contrast, the TVS Ntorq 125 is available in six variants, ranging from ₹86,982 to ₹1,05,982 (ex-showroom). The ex-showroom price of Hero Xoom 125 is ₹88,468 and TVS Ntorq 125 is ₹94,645 on average.
Hero Xoom 125 is the cheapest among these scooters, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers seeking sporty styling. The Hero Xoom 125, unveiled at the 2024 EICMA show in Milan and launched at the Bharat Mobility Expo 2025, marks Hero’s entry into the competitive 125cc scooter segment positioned as a larger sibling to the Xoom 110.
Design Philosophy: Fresh vs Proven
Hero Xoom 125 – Modern and Sharp
The Hero Xoom 125 builds upon the Xoom 110’s design but with an edgier and more muscular stance. The aggressive front apron, sharp creases and sleek LED lighting give it a futuristic appeal. With 14-inch alloy wheels, it stands taller than most rivals in its class, making it a commanding presence on the road.
Both scooters are styled to grab attention, and the Xoom 125 features a sleek, modern design that looks sharper and more upmarket than its 110cc counterpart. Its 14-inch alloy wheels, clean-cut lines, and sequential indicators add a dash of youth to its otherwise mature appearance. The Xoom 125 is one of the sportiest looking scooters out there with apron mounted LED headlight along with matte grey coloured side panels and a split tail lamp design that looks quite neatly integrated.
It is a bold looking scooter with striking colour options that make it stand out differently in the ever growing 125cc scooter market. The VX variant is available in Matte Storm Gray and Metallic Turbo Blue, while the ZX variant comes in Matte Neon Lime and Inferno Red.
TVS Ntorq 125 – Race-Inspired Character
On the other hand, the TVS Ntorq 125 has been a benchmark for stylish scooters in India. It features a race-inspired design with bold graphics, a noteworthy and stylish tail section and a stealthy front fascia. The Race XP and XT variants take the aesthetics up further with unique colour schemes and dynamic bodywork.
The Ntorq Race XP goes for a racier aesthetic with excessive graphics, faux carbon finishes, better build quality in comparison, and a slightly more muscular profile. The Ntorq, too, looks quite appealing with its compact design and sharp panels. The best part is that the Ntorq is offered in a number of paint schemes to suit customers with all kinds of mindset.
While the Ntorq sits on smaller 12-inch wheels, its lower stance and aggressive appeal make it a head-turner. However, there’s no denying that the Ntorq is beginning to show its age, with no major design updates since its launch. TVS has added newer variants over time that bring more tech and features to the overall package, but the core design hasn’t seen any significant changes since its inception.
Engine Performance: Smooth vs Sporty
Hero Xoom 125 Powertrain
The Hero Xoom 125 is powered by a 124.6cc, air-cooled engine which is capable of churning out 9.8 bhp at 7,250 rpm and 10.4 Nm of peak torque at 6,000 rpm. For the VX version, 124.6 cc Petrol engine of Xoom 125 produces 9.92 PS at 7250 rpm of power and 10.4 Nm at 6000 rpm of torque.
Hero claims a 0 to 60kmph time of 7.6 seconds for the Xoom 125. Mated to a CVT transmission, the power delivery is expected to be smooth and efficient. The Xoom 125 reaches 60kph quicker in tests, with the Ntorq catching up only beyond that.
TVS Ntorq 125 Performance Edge
The TVS Ntorq 125, on the other hand, features a slightly larger 124.8cc engine, delivering 9.5PS and 10.6Nm in standard variants. For the STD version, 124.8 cc Petrol engine of NTORQ 125 produces 9.5 PS at 7000 rpm of power and 10.6 Nm at 5500 rpm of torque.
The high-performance Race XP variant ups the game with 10.3PS and 10.9Nm, achieving 0 to 60 km/h in 6.7 seconds. The TVS Ntorq 125 gets a 124cc single-cylinder engine but where the standard variant only has 9.5PS to offer, the top Race XP and XT variants make 10.2PS and 10.6Nm, making it more powerful than the Xoom 125.
The TVS Ntorq Race XP makes 10.1hp and 10.8Nm, and at just 111kg, it’s 10kg lighter than the Xoom. The extra power and lighter weight give it snappier acceleration and better top-end performance. The Ntorq also boasts a top speed of 90 km/h, cementing its sporty credentials.
Fuel Efficiency Battle
In city conditions, the Hero Xoom 125 came out ahead, returning a noticeably higher 56.70kpl which is 4.3kpl more than the Ntorq Race XP. This difference comes mainly from the stop-start system which aided quite a bit during the city run. Out on the highway the Xoom 125 manages to score a reasonably high 55.70kpl. Combined, this comes up to an average fuel efficiency figure of 56.20kpl.
The Ntorq claws back an edge on the highway with a higher 56.66kpl, likely because of its slightly more powerful engine and more relaxed cruising nature. In the city the Ntorq isn’t as efficient as the Xoom 125 but still manages a respectable 52.4kpl figure. Combined these two figures give us an average fuel efficiency number of 54.53kpl.
The claimed mileage of Hero Xoom 125 is 52.8 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS NTORQ 125 is 53.4 kmpl. Hero Xoom 125 has a mileage of 48 kmpl which has better real-world efficiency than TVS Ntorq 125 at 43 kmpl. Both scooters deliver some of the best real-world fuel efficiency figures in the 125cc segment, with just 1.67kpl separating them on average.
Features and Technology
Hero Xoom 125 Practical Tech
The Xoom 125 is loaded with modern features, including a fully digital LCD instrument cluster with Bluetooth connectivity, turn-by-turn navigation, and an external fuel filler. It also gets an illuminated start switch, all-LED lighting and segment-first cornering front lights that enhance visibility during turns.
It also packs in LED lighting, a fully digital LCD cluster with Bluetooth, turn-by-turn navigation, and even a USB charger hidden in the front cubby. The Xoom’s simple and easy-to-read LCD display does the job but with no extra flash or flair. While the Xoom leans towards a cleaner design and practical features – like an external fuel filler with a buzzer – it provides thoughtful convenience.
TVS Ntorq 125 Advanced Features
The TVS Ntorq 125 takes things a step further with its SmartXonnect system. The top-end XT variant features a TFT display with live notifications, including messages, navigation and even live cricket scores. The Race XP edition adds Street and Race riding modes. The riding modes and TVS’s connected tech make the Ntorq more versatile in different riding conditions.
The Ntorq gets a densely packed LCD screen that’s feature-rich and even has two riding modes. The Ntorq Race XP gets an LCD that is feature loaded and packed with information. The TVS Ntorq gets an LCD screen with smartphone connectivity, turn-by-turn navigation, 0 to 60kmph recorder, average speed, lap timer, and a top speed recorder. Other features include voice assisted mode selector and navigation activation.
Thanks to its two riding modes – Street and Race – the Ntorq gives riders the option to dial things back for efficiency or go all-out when needed. If you go for the top XT variant, you’ll also get a TFT display with Bluetooth connectivity and a host of connected features.
Storage and Practicality
Xoom 125 Adequate Space
The Hero Xoom 125 gets a 25-litre underseat storage with an automatic bootlight. The Xoom 125 also gets convenient cubby holes near the front apron along with a utility hook. The floorboard area is decently sized. Fuel tank capacity is 5 litres and it gets an external fuel filler cap.
You get 17 litres of underseat storage with the Xoom 125. While the underseat storage can manage groceries or a backpack, neither scooter has enough room for a full-face helmet. The front cubby provides useful storage for gloves or small items.
Ntorq 125 More Storage
The Ntorq claws back some ground with its larger 22-litre underseat storage, which is 5 litres more than the Xoom. TVS has given the Ntorq 125 an underseat storage of 22 litres along with a 5.8-litre fuel tank which is comparatively larger than that on the Xoom 125.
The Ntorq does not get any apron mounted cubby holes but it does get a utility hook along with a decent size floorboard. Its additional front cubby has proven genuinely useful for stashing gloves or a water bottle, and the all-in-one key slot adds everyday convenience. The larger fuel tank provides better range between fill-ups.
Riding Comfort and Ergonomics
Hero Xoom 125 Comfort Issues
The Xoom’s riding position is upright and neutral, but taller riders will find it a bit cramped, mainly due to the seat design. Its sculpted saddle has a pronounced scoop that limits how far back you can slide, which can start to feel restrictive over longer rides. This proved to be the biggest issue with the Xoom, although it is something that should be fixable by an aftermarket seat maker.
Pillion comfort is reasonable, though the seat design could be better optimized for passenger comfort on longer journeys.
Ntorq 125 Superior Ergonomics
The Ntorq Race XP, by comparison, is noticeably more comfortable and accommodating. Its flatter, more spacious seat and relaxed handlebar-to-footpeg geometry make it a better fit for taller riders – or anyone doing longer commutes – and the pillion perch is better shaped, too.
Interestingly, even though the Ntorq’s seat height is just 7mm lower than the Xoom’s, most shorter riders found it easier to get their feet down on the Ntorq – perhaps owing to the seat contour and overall stance. The Ntorq’s seat is more accommodating for riders of different heights.
Weight and Handling
Hero Xoom 125 is heavier at 120 kg than TVS Ntorq 125 at 118 kg. The Hero Xoom 125 makes 9.9hp and 10.4Nm from its 124.6cc air-cooled engine. With a kerb weight of 121kg, it’s heavier than you might expect — but Hero’s tuning ensures it still feels responsive in city traffic.
At 111kg, the Ntorq weighs significantly less than the Xoom 125 in comparison. On paper the Xoom 125 appears to be quite heavy at 120kg but real life riding experience can be different. The lighter weight of the Ntorq contributes to its nimble handling and quicker acceleration.
Suspension and Ride Quality
The Hero Xoom 125 gets a telescopic fork and rear monoshock. For braking, it uses a front disc and a rear drum brake setup. On the suspension front, both scooters come equipped with a telescopic fork and a monoshock setup. However, the Xoom 125’s larger 14-inch wheels offer better stability on rough roads.
The TVS Ntorq gets a telescopic fork and rear monoshock. It gets a front disc and rear drum brake setup. On the other hand, the Ntorq’s setup focuses more on nimble handling and spirited riding through traffic.
Which Scooter Should You Choose?
Choose Hero Xoom 125 If
You want the most affordable entry with lower starting price. Superior city fuel efficiency of 56.70 kmpl matters most. Larger 14-inch wheels and better stability appeal to you. Modern, fresh design and premium road presence matter. The external fuel filler adds convenience for you. Cornering front lights are a priority safety feature. You prefer Hero’s extensive service network. Smoother, more refined riding experience is preferred. Quicker 0-60 kmph acceleration in real-world tests appeals. You want a new, contemporary design over aging aesthetics.
Choose TVS Ntorq 125 If
You want maximum features and technology with SmartXonnect. The Street and Race riding modes add versatility you need. Lighter weight of 111kg provides easier handling. More powerful Race XP variant with 10.3PS excites you. Larger 22-liter underseat storage is essential. Better highway fuel efficiency of 56.66 kmpl matters. Superior comfort for taller riders is a priority. More spacious and accommodating seat suits your needs. The proven reliability and market presence provide confidence. TFT display in XT variant with live updates appeals.
The Final Verdict
Both the Hero Xoom 125 and TVS Ntorq 125 deliver some of the best real-world fuel efficiency figures in the 125cc segment. The Xoom has a slight edge in city mileage, while the Ntorq does better on the highway. But what tips the scales is the Ntorq’s larger tank and better power-to-weight ratio. It goes farther on a tank, is quicker, and offers riding modes that add both performance and flexibility to the equation.
As per the users experiences Hero Xoom 125 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort and features in your bike. But TVS NTORQ 125 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance and maintenance. According to average user rating, Hero Xoom 125 has a score of 4.5/5 while TVS Ntorq 125 is rated 4.4/5, showing both are highly appreciated by owners.
If you prioritize fresh styling, a tall stance, and superior road presence, the Hero Xoom 125 is a great choice. Its larger wheels and modern design give it an edge in aesthetics and ride stability. However, if you are after performance, tech-packed features, and a thrilling ride experience, the TVS Ntorq 125, especially the Race XP variant, proves to be the more exciting option.
With its multiple ride modes, SmartXonnect features and a slightly more powerful engine, the Ntorq stands out as the sportier and more feature-rich choice. The 125cc scooter segment is fiercely competitive, with both offerings presenting unique strengths. Visit dealerships, test ride both scooters, and choose based on whether you prioritize fresh design and efficiency or proven performance and technology.
